Art Documentary Reality (week two- Indian Arts on Film )

Documentary is one of my favorite media forms. People can gain information as well as experience entertainment during a documentary. To most people, they take what they see in the documentary as a “real” story. To those audiences, “documentary have a claim to truth, a claim to honesty, objectivity and veracity”(Kitty Zulmans, Documentary Evidence), documenters need to fine a way to maintain the original idea as much as possible. However, no matter how “real” it is, a documentary is no doubt a result of personal intelligence and media technology. As Kitty Zulmans claims in Documentary Evidence : what the viewer takes as reality is in fact a reality seen by someone else; it is a second order observation.  When documentary comes to art works, this theory seems to be more obvious. The art work itself is the original information given by the artist. If a filmmaker wants to make a documentary about that, he or she is actually re-creating the work. They more or less put their thought and understanding of the work in the documentary. As I as I’m concerned, a successful documentary about art conveys proper idea of the initial work and is wisely reconstituted by logical organization and creativity.

Back to those tow documentaries directed by Arun Khopkar, I should say, I really like them. In Figures of Thought, the idea of placing the three artists to work on a glass mural then zero into each one is creative and reasonable. In this way, Arun relates the individual smoothly. Turn visual art, which is still, into documentary film is not easy. Arun uses sound, music, light, animation and oral introduction to give information about the paintings and relevant artists. Then, the still, untouchable, abstract work becomes alive and understandable. As for Volume Zero, many more narrative methods have been used. Arun broads the information through interview, live action, diagrams, animation etc. Though it is a documentary about an architect and his work, the documentary not only pays attention to the life story and architectural structure, but also the society background and culture or science demands. These extended information is what the filmmaker believes important to express, is his understanding of the work.

To sum up, documentary needs to be relatively real and creative. When documentary come to associate with art works, the other art and data methods are counted in, as animation, music and graphs.

Advertisements

About celiayixie

I'm a girl who are looking for a place to be home~
This entry was posted in tp1112. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Art Documentary Reality (week two- Indian Arts on Film )

  1. Dave Itzy says:

    Great critical observations about the use of different elements in the documentary (diagrams, animation, interview etc) and I like your explanation of distinction made between the way narratives are formed in the different documentaries.

    I also agree with your analysis of Kitty Zulman’s writing, in that the ‘second order observation’ is true – whatever we (as filmmakers) are documenting is to be remembered that it is a reality to the subject and not overlooked as simple ‘subject matter’.

  2. I think it is important to also observe how the filmmaker re-creates the Artwork since he/she
    would have re-interpreted the work in the way he/she shot, interviewed the artist and edited the work.
    I believe that artists create a piece and then let it grow a bit like a child. When I ask what they meant, I rarely get a very specific answer, some would tell me what they thought and what it represented when they created their work, how they felt then but they would also validate my own interpretation.

    I believe that the process of film making is Art in itself and can inform as well as offer a specific experience of the Artwork portrayed. A successful documentary about an art piece is about contextualization but also interpretation rather than reconstitution.

    I understand reconstitution as putting back together pieces of information and bring into the present times what was then. I am not sure it is possible to reconstruct the very making of a piece of Art but I know it is possible to share with an audience from an emotional standpoint the story of an Art piece.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s